![]() This happens because some entrants aren't 100% random, and the worse of them can be exploited by the better of them. For a tournament that pays cash to the top 10%, most human players would consider anything in the bottom 90% to be poor, which would include a 50% win rate from a random AI. Even players who were considered very good just five years ago, can no longer compete at the highest levels.Ī 100% random RPS AI doesn't have a poor 1-on-1 win rate against any other RPS AI, but it absolutely can have a poor rate of winning tournaments, if "poor" is defined broadly enough. Poker strategy has come a long way since Super System and The Theory of Poker. ![]() If you want to get a sense of how much skill goes into playing poker at the highest level, you should watch some of Phil Galfond's strategy videos on YouTube (see for instance ). There are lots of small stakes and mid stakes players who practice sensible bankroll management, but who will never acquire the skill necessary to make it at the highest levels. I don't think there is any evidence that he is anywhere near the top when it comes to cash games of any popular variety.Īnd while bankroll management is certainly an important and required skill to endure as a professional poker player at any level, it is by no means what differentiates high-stakes pros from pros at the lower levels. There is no question that Daniel Negreanu is a very good tournament player, possibly one of the best.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |